Book Mark

Ike.ninja

Linux Fun
  • Home
  • How to
  • Reference Links
  • Categories
    • Releases
    • Plesk
    • Community
    • CMS
    • security
    • MYSQL
    • cPanel
  • Tools
    • IP Checker
    • Byte Converter
RSS

Most Reliable Hosting Company Sites in February 2012

Mar05
by Ike on March 5, 2012 at 2:25 pm
Posted In: Hosting, Performance
Rank Company site OS Outage
hh:mm:ss
Failed
Req%
DNS Connect First
byte
Total
1 Codero Linux 0:00:00 0.018 0.134 0.055 0.318 0.549
2 INetU Windows Server 2008 0:00:00 0.022 0.069 0.047 0.183 0.327
3 DinaHosting Linux 0:00:00 0.025 0.310 0.090 0.182 0.182
4 WestHost Linux 0:00:00 0.025 0.356 0.107 0.235 0.602
5 Netcetera Windows Server 2008 0:00:00 0.029 0.182 0.054 0.109 0.225
6 Hosting 4 Less Linux 0:00:00 0.029 0.227 0.079 0.160 0.359
7 Logicworks Linux 0:00:00 0.032 0.100 0.074 0.163 0.432
8 NaviSite Windows Server 2003 0:00:00 0.032 0.385 0.082 0.317 0.617
9 Catalyst2 Windows Server 2008 0:00:00 0.036 0.177 0.065 0.135 0.271
10 New York Internet FreeBSD 0:00:00 0.036 0.168 0.070 0.142 0.414

See full table

Codero was this month’s most reliable hosting provider, and has been placed in the top 25 most reliable hosting companies for 10 of the last 12 months. Codero is a Kansas-based company which provides dedicated, managed and cloud servers, as well as eCommerce and small business hosting.

INetU took second place for the second consecutive month, having regularly appeared in the top 10 over the last year. The company offers managed and cloud hosting from its data centres in Pennsylvania, Virginia and the Netherlands.

The Spanish company DinaHosting took third place this month, with virtual, dedicated and cloud service offerings, as well as server colocation.

Half of this month’s 10 most reliable hosting companies use Linux, with slightly less than half running Windows Server, and one provider using FreeBSD.

Netcraft measures and makes available the response times of around forty leading hosting providers’ sites. The performance measurements are made at fifteen minute intervals from separate points around the internet, and averages are calculated over the immediately preceding 24 hour period.

From a customer’s point of view, the percentage of failed requests is more pertinent than outages on hosting companies’ own sites, as this gives a pointer to reliability of routing, and this is why we choose to rank our table by fewest failed requests, rather than shortest periods of outage. In the event the number of failed requests are equal then sites are ranked by average connection times.

Information on the measurement process and current measurements is available.

└ Tags: Hosting, Performance
 Comment 

[20120302] – Core – XSS Vulnerability

Mar05
by Ike on March 5, 2012 at 2:00 pm
Posted In: CMS, Core Security, Joomla, security
  • Project: Joomla!
  • SubProject: All
  • Severity: Moderate
  • Versions: 2.5.1 and 2.5.0
  • Exploit type: XSS Vulnerability
  • Reported Date: 2012-February-29
  • Fixed Date: 2012-March-05

Description

Inadequate filtering leads to XSS vulnerability.

Affected Installs

Joomla! version 2.5.1 and 2.5.0.

Solution

Upgrade to version 2.5.2

Reported by Phil Purviance

Contact

The JSST at the Joomla! Security Center.

└ Tags: Core Security
 Comment 

[20120301] – Core – SQL Injection

Mar05
by Ike on March 5, 2012 at 2:00 pm
Posted In: CMS, Core Security, Joomla, security
  • Project: Joomla!
  • SubProject: All
  • Severity: High
  • Versions: 2.5.1, 2.5.0 and 1.7.0 – 1.7.5
  • Exploit type: SQL Injection
  • Reported Date: 2012-February-29
  • Fixed Date: 2012-March-05

Description

Inadequate escaping leads to SQL injection vulnerability.

Affected Installs

Joomla! version 2.5.1, 2.5.0, 1.7.4, and all earlier 1.7.x versions

Solution

Upgrade to version 2.5.2

Reported by Ching Shiong Sow, Stratsec

Contact

The JSST at the Joomla! Security Center.

└ Tags: Core Security
 Comment 

March 2012 Web Server Survey

Mar05
by Ike on March 5, 2012 at 1:26 pm
Posted In: Web Server Survey

In the March 2012 survey we received responses from 644,275,754 sites, giving a rise of 31.4M hostnames (5.1%) since last month.

Apache continued to gain hostnames this month with a growth of 22.5M and, contrary to last month, was able to increase its market share by a third of a percentage point. nginx had another good month and experienced an increase of 4.7M hostnames or 7.82%. With all other major web server vendors showing higher growth than Microsoft’s 761k increase, Microsoft recorded a drop in market share of half a percentage point. The gap between Microsoft and nginx now stands at 23.6M hostnames.

Amongst the Million Busiest Sites, Apache again suffered a small drop in market share this month, losing 1,700 sites, extending a trend that dates back to August 2011. Microsoft gained 110 sites making this the first time it has recorded an increase since June 2010. nginx continued to increase its market share and gained 1.2k sites, whilst Google suffered a small loss of 289 sites.

Total Sites Across All Domains
August 1995 – March 2012

Total Sites Across All Domains, August 1995 - March 2012

Market Share for Top Servers Across All Domains
August 1995 – March 2012

Graph of market share for top servers across all domains, August 1995 - March 2012

Developer February 2012 Percent March 2012 Percent Change
Apache 397,867,089 64.92% 420,337,139 65.24% 0.32
Microsoft 88,210,995 14.39% 88,971,973 13.81% -0.58
nginx 60,627,200 9.89% 65,369,149 10.15% 0.25
Google 19,394,196 3.16% 21,150,938 3.28% 0.12


Totals for Active Sites Across All Domains
June 2000 – March 2012

Developer February 2012 Percent March 2012 Percent Change
Apache 106,664,061 57.45% 108,035,584 57.46% 0.01
nginx 23,590,737 12.71% 24,011,199 12.77% 0.06
Microsoft 22,363,730 12.05% 22,537,872 11.99% -0.06
Google 14,316,485 7.71% 14,438,358 7.68% -0.03

For more information see Active Sites

Market Share for Top Servers Across the Million Busiest Sites
September 2008 – March 2012

Developer February 2012 Percent March 2012 Percent Change
Apache 622,816 62.57% 621,111 62.39% -0.17
Microsoft 147,689 14.84% 147,799 14.85% 0.01
nginx 96,596 9.70% 97,767 9.82% 0.12
Google 30,229 3.04% 29,940 3.01% -0.03

└ Tags: Web Server Survey
 Comment 

CentOS 4 and RHEL 4 6-Month End of Life Notice

Mar02
by Ike on March 2, 2012 at 3:55 pm
Posted In: Apache, CMS, Community, cPanel, Events, Releases, security, System

For continued compatibility with the latest versions of cPanel & WHM, please update your server to CentOS 6 or RHEL 6.

CentOS and Red Hat discontinued support for version 4 of their respective operating systems on February 29, 2012. 
 
cPanel & WHM version 11.32 will be the last to support version 4 of these operating systems. In accordance with our end of life policy, cPanel & WHM will continue to function on these systems after the operating system end of life date.
 
If you currently run version 4 of CentOS or RHEL, we recommend upgrading your server to version 6 of your operating system. 
 
To determine your installed operating system version, use the following command:
 
    cat /etc/redhat-release
 
For more information, please visit: 
  • cPanel’s End of Life policy 
  • Red Hat Linux Extended Life Cycle support
└ Tags: command, Red Hat, update
 Comment 
  • Page 2,900 of 2,972
  • « First
  • «
  • 2,898
  • 2,899
  • 2,900
  • 2,901
  • 2,902
  • »
  • Last »

What’s New?

  • Debian: Important DoS Vulnerabilities in FFmpeg DSA-6080-1 Advisory
  • Ubuntu 20.04 LTS: USN-7922-1 Linux Kernel Important Security Issues
  • Ubuntu 24.04 LTS: Kernel Important Security Fixes USN-7921-1 CVE-2025-39946
  • Debian: firefox-esr Critical Privilege Escalation DSA-6078-1 CVE-2025-14321
  • 2026 Global Partner Program Announcement
  • Fedora 43: python3-docs Update 2025-e235793f10 – Maintenance Release
  • Fedora 43: python3.14 Critical Update Addresses Quadratic Complexity Bug
  • Debian: WordPress Important XSS and Info Disclosure DSA-6075-1
  • Ubuntu 22.04 LTS: fontTools Important Path Traversal Risk CVE-2025-66034
  • Debian: webkit2gtk Critical Info Exfiltration DSA-6074-1 CVE-2025-13947
  • Ubuntu 25.10: Radare2 Critical Memory Leak Security Advisory USN-7915-1
  • Fedora 41 ABRT Critical Command Injection Vulnerability Fix CVE-2025-12744
  • Fedora 42: mingw-libpng Important Heap Buffer Overflow Vuln 2025-9d0f04f316
  • Ubuntu: WebKitGTK High Remote Code Execution Threat USN-7914-1
  • Debian Trixie: FFmpeg Critical Denial of Service and Code Exec DSA-6073-1
  • Fedora 42: tinygltf Update 2.9.7 Advisory FEDORA-2025-ac8ed4a110
  • Fedora 43: webkitgtk Critical Update for CVE-2025-13947, 43458, 66287
  • Fedora 43: TinyGLTF 2.9.7 Security Advisory FEDORA-2025-47bff6f74d
  • Fedora 42: abrt Critical Command Injection Vulnerability CVE-2025-12744
  • Fedora 42: Chromium High CVE-2025-13630, 13631, 13632 Advisory
  • Fedora 42: cef High Type Confusion Vuln CVE-2025-13223,13224 Advisory
  • Fedora 43: chromium High CVE-2025-13630 Type Confusion and more
  • Fedora 43: abrt Critical Command Injection Fix CVE-2025-12744
  • Ubuntu 22.04: Linux Kernel Azure Important Security Flaws USN-7910-2
  • Ubuntu 22.04: Important Linux Kernel Updates Addressing Security Flaws

Search

Translator

Tags

Business and industry code Community cPanel CVE Debian Debian Linux Distribution - Security Advisories Development Events Fedora Fedora Linux Distribution - Security Advisories General Hosting Important Advisory Linux Moderate Advisory Month in WordPress news Parallels Plesk Parallels Plesk Panel Performance PHP Plesk news and announcements Plesk Panel Podcast ProdDevSec Product and technology Products Project Release News Red Hat Red Hat Linux Distribution - Security Advisories Releases security Security Centre sensitive site Ubuntu Ubuntu Linux Distribution - Security Advisories update updates Various vulnerability Web Server Survey Wordpress wp-briefing

Posts

Helpful Links

  • Liquidweb.com
  • MYSQL Dev Documentation
  • Plugins
  • Source forge SED command
  • Themes
  • WordPress Documentation
  • You Tube
December 2025
M T W T F S S
« Nov    
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031  
  • Google
  • Yahoo
  • Liquid Web
  • Storm
  • YouTube

©1999-2025 Ike.ninja | Powered by WordPress with Easel | Subscribe: RSS | Back to Top ↑

50 queries. 8.75 mb Memory usage. 0.316 seconds.